Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Progress 2012 | Contact Us | Home RSS
 
 
 

If it makes it onto the November ballot, would you vote in favor of the Clean Water, Lands and Outdoors Heritage Amendment?

  1. Yes, it is money well spent
  2. No, backers are asking for too much money
  3. No, the purpose is not specific enough
  4. What is the Clean Water, Lands and Outdoors Heritage Amendment?
 
 
 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(3)

floating

Feb-21-12 11:45 AM

If the ND game and fish were in control of the spending, with a cap or a way to stop the funding if the state is going broke, I would vote for it. i would not trust any one else with the money. Look at Minots flood funds! Oh can't find where the money went. Look at the abuse after the college's were given control of our tax money! There must be a easy way to cut off the funding== 40% of the voters can stop it?

1 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

ChasinND

Feb-21-12 11:36 AM

Way Way to much money. Wildlife conservation has a source for money.

1 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

dakkratt

Feb-21-12 8:26 AM

A coalition has filed a constitutional initiated measure petition with the North Dakota Secretary of State that would establish dedicated funding for water, land and wildlife conservation in North Dakota.The constitutional amendment will establish a Clean Water, Lands and Outdoor Heritage Fund that will receive five percent of the total revenues generated from taxes collected from the production and extraction of oil and gas. Supporters estimate the fund could generate $50 million annually, based on current state oil production and price projections. For those 70 percent,Now we know .

4 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 3 of 3 comments
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web